Localization matching component

ABSTRACT

Embodiments of a localization system are disclosed. In one embodiment, a plurality of localization components provide localized data that is localized to one or more distinct markets. A translation matching component receives a localization request corresponding to input data to be localized. The translation matching component accesses the plurality of localization components based on the localization request. The translation matching component selects and outputs localized data from one or more of the plurality of localization components based on pre-determined criteria. In one embodiment, the translation matching component selects the localized data based on a time required to obtain the localized data. In another embodiment, the localization components provide confidence scores associated with the localized data, the translation matching component selecting the localized data based on the confidence scores.

The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S.provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/659,916, filed Mar. 8, 2005,the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in itsentirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention deals with data processing.

Localization is a process of modifying products or services to accountfor differences in distinct markets. A very common example oflocalization occurs when an application is authored in a source languageand is introduced into a market that uses a target language differentfrom the original one. For instance, if an application were authored inthe English language and then introduced into China, it would belocalized by translating the various English language strings and UIelements (menus, icons, etc.), software components and user assistancein the application into Chinese. The UI layout and style (including fonttype, size, control positions, etc.) will also likely be changed to suitthe target language. Of course, the concept of localization is broaderthan simply modifying language. Markets that use the same language maybe distinct for other reasons. For instance, a software application maybe “localized” for different age groups. It may have one set of languageand appearance for adults and another for children or teens. Thus,localization illustratively accommodates for a wide variety ofdifferences in distinct markets.

Although, as described above, localization involves many more thingsthat just translating strings; to facilitate the reading of the documentwe will concentrate the description on that scenario. In a similar way,most of the examples are taken from the software localization field butthe invention is not limited to software localization. Similarly, whilemuch of the present discussion focuses on localizing a product, theinvention is not so limited and is just as applicable to services, andthus the term “product” includes “services” for the sake of thisdescription. In the past, there has not been a system-level attempt toprovide localization but instead, localization has been performed usingindividual components to solve individual problems. For instance, alocalizer may be augmented with certain machine translation techniquesto improve localization speed, accuracy and consistency. However, adifferent localizer may use just translation memories in order toincrease the recycle rate by reusing previous translations, henceproviding a more consistent result at a higher speed than she wouldwithout tools.

Also, this has all been done, conventionally, in an offline way. Inother words, the author creates an entire application or a large portionof a component, and that component or application is provided to alocalizer for localization. The usual process is such that thelocalizer's interaction with the original author is minimal ornon-existent. This makes it hard to introduce changes in the originalcontent that would ease its localization. In fact, in many cases,localization is not performed until well after the entire product hasbeen developed and a strategic marketing decision has been made toexpand that product into a different market that uses a differentlanguage or is distinct in another way. In all of these cases, there istypically very little up front work done in developing an applicationwith localization in mind or even optimizing for localization.Similarly, there is very little support, in the development/authoringstage, for developing an application or other product/service which willbe relatively easy to localize, even though authoring a product orservice which is easily localizable is no more difficult than authoringone that is not easy to localize.

Therefore, products, services and applications have traditionally beentranslated into different languages or otherwise localized through acomplex, manual and labor intensive process. The cost for thislocalization of software products, and the translation of productrelated content, represents a significant hurdle which must be overcomein order to enter new markets. This is especially true for small tomid-size independent software vendors or content authors.

The problem of localization also scales depending on the particularlocation in which the software is developed. For developers that areauthoring software in locations that have large markets, localizing thesoftware to different (and likely smaller) markets is less of a need.However, if a developer authors in a location (and using a language)which has a relatively small market, the entire viability of the productmay depend on the ability to localize that product into languages usedin larger markets. This requires the manufacturers to spend aninordinately high amount of resources on localization. This oftendetracts from the resources available for development.

Another problem associated with prior localization efforts is that therehas not been a good way to draw on the work of a variety of otherlocalization sources. For instance, a wide variety of vendors localizetheir products for various markets. Similar applications, developed bydifferent vendors may likely be localizing the same, or very similar,strings or software for the same markets. However, there is currently noexpedient way for the two to draw on, or share, the efforts of oneanother. Therefore, there is a great deal of duplicated effort inlocalizing products.

Furthermore, there are many different programming models (such as Win32,CLR and WEB scripting) with different types of resource managers,resource formats and data stores. They require different parsers andtool sets to handle localization, which results in complex and costlyprocesses, and inconsistencies in localization quality.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a system for processing data.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is one illustrative embodiment of an environment in which thepresent invention can be used.

FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of a runtime environmentdeploying aspects of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating the overall operation of theplatform (or system) shown in FIG. 2 in which a translation isunavailable.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the operation of a matchingcomponent shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 is a more detailed block diagram of the localization platform (orsystem) shown in FIG. 2, as used during development of an application orother content.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating how a product can be developedimplementing techniques that aid in later localization, in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides an operating system with an integratedlocalization platform, or a localization platform which has componentsclosely operable with the operating system, although not fullyintegrated. The present localization platform can also be provided as aservice that is requested by the operating system. The present inventionutilizes the localization platform to localize content and software. Thepresent invention can also be used during the development of products orservices, implementing practices which enable quicker and more efficientlocalization of the product or service. The present discussion willproceed primarily with respect to translation during the localizationprocess, but the invention is not so limited and localization includes awide variety of other accommodations for distinct markets as well. Priorto describing the present invention in more detail, one embodiment of anenvironment in which the present invention can be used will bedescribed.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a suitable computing system environment100 on which the invention may be implemented. The computing systemenvironment 100 is only one example of a suitable computing environmentand is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use orfunctionality of the invention. Neither should the computing environment100 be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating toany one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplaryoperating environment 100.

The invention is operational with numerous other general purpose orspecial purpose computing system environments or configurations.Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/orconfigurations that may be suitable for use with the invention include,but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-heldor laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems,set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs,minicomputers, mainframe computers, telephony systems, distributedcomputing environments that include any of the above systems or devices,and the like.

The invention may be described in the general context ofcomputer-executable instructions, such as program modules, beingexecuted by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines,programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that performparticular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Theinvention is designed to be practiced in distributed computingenvironments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices thatare linked through a communications network. In a distributed computingenvironment, program modules are located in both local and remotecomputer storage media including memory storage devices.

With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary system for implementing theinvention includes a general-purpose computing device in the form of acomputer 110. Components of computer 110 may include, but are notlimited to, a processing unit 120, a system memory 130, and a system bus121 that couples various system components including the system memoryto the processing unit 120. The system bus 121 may be any of severaltypes of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, aperipheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of busarchitectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architecturesinclude Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro ChannelArchitecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video ElectronicsStandards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral ComponentInterconnect (PCI) bus also known as Mezzanine bus.

Computer 110 typically includes a variety of computer readable media.Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessedby computer 110 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media,removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and notlimitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage mediaand communication media. Computer storage media includes both volatileand nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in anymethod or technology for storage of information such as computerreadable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM,EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digitalversatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes,magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices,or any other medium which can be used to store the desired informationand which can be accessed by computer 110. Communication media typicallyembodies computer readable instructions, data structures, programmodules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier waveor other transport mechanism and includes any information deliverymedia. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one ormore of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encodeinformation in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation,communication media includes wired media such as a wired network ordirect-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF,infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the aboveshould also be included within the scope of computer readable media.

The system memory 130 includes computer storage media in the form ofvolatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 131and random access memory (RAM) 132. A basic input/output system 133(BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer informationbetween elements within computer 110, such as during start-up, istypically stored in ROM 131. RAM 132 typically contains data and/orprogram modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presentlybeing operated on by processing unit 120. By way of example, and notlimitation, FIG. 1 illustrates operating system 134, applicationprograms 135, other program modules 136, and program data 137.

The computer 110 may also include other removable/non-removablevolatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only,FIG. 1 illustrates a hard disk drive 141 that reads from or writes tonon-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media, a magnetic disk drive 151that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile magnetic disk 152,and an optical disk drive 155 that reads from or writes to a removable,nonvolatile optical disk 156 such as a CD ROM or other optical media.Other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storagemedia that can be used in the exemplary operating environment include,but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards,digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solidstate ROM, and the like. The hard disk drive 141 is typically connectedto the system bus 121 through a non-removable memory interface such asinterface 140, and magnetic disk drive 151 and optical disk drive 155are typically connected to the system bus 121 by a removable memoryinterface, such as interface 150.

The drives and their associated computer storage media discussed aboveand illustrated in FIG. 1, provide storage of computer readableinstructions, data structures, program modules and other data for thecomputer 110. In FIG. 1, for example, hard disk drive 141 is illustratedas storing operating system 144, application programs 145, other programmodules 146, and program data 147. Note that these components can eitherbe the same as or different from operating system 134, applicationprograms 135, other program modules 136, and program data 137. Operatingsystem 144, application programs 145, other program modules 146, andprogram data 147 are given different numbers here to illustrate that, ata minimum, they are different copies.

A user may enter commands and information into the computer 110 throughinput devices such as a keyboard 162, a microphone 163, and a pointingdevice 161, such as a mouse, trackball or touch pad. Other input devices(not shown) may include a joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner,or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to theprocessing unit 120 through a user input interface 160 that is coupledto the system bus, but may be connected by other interface and busstructures, such as a parallel port, game port or a universal serial bus(USB). A monitor 191 or other type of display device is also connectedto the system bus 121 via an interface, such as a video interface 190.In addition to the monitor, computers may also include other peripheraloutput devices such as speakers 197 and printer 196, which may beconnected through an output peripheral interface 195.

The computer 110 is operated in a networked environment using logicalconnections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer180. The remote computer 180 may be a personal computer, a hand-helddevice, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other commonnetwork node, and typically includes many or all of the elementsdescribed above relative to the computer 110. The logical connectionsdepicted in FIG. 1 include a local area network (LAN) 171 and a widearea network (WAN) 173, but may also include other networks. Suchnetworking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-widecomputer networks, intranets and the Internet.

When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 110 is connectedto the LAN 171 through a network interface or adapter 170. When used ina WAN networking environment, the computer 110 typically includes amodem 172 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN173, such as the Internet. The modem 172, which may be internal orexternal, may be connected to the system bus 121 via the user inputinterface 160, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networkedenvironment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 110, orportions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. Byway of example, and not limitation, FIG. 1 illustrates remoteapplication programs 185 as residing on remote computer 180. It will beappreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and othermeans of establishing a communications link between the computers may beused.

FIG. 2 illustrates a localization platform (or system) 200 which isintegrated into operating system 134 shown in FIG. 1. Localizationplatform 200 is shown with a number of different memory stores, and itwill be appreciated that those memory stores can be embodied in any ofthe variety of storage devices shown in FIG. 1, or in different storagesdevices. System 200 is shown interactively arranged with an application202 that will undergo localization and a variety of input sources 204that input various translations into the data stores in system 200through data gathering component 205.

System 200, itself, includes resource manager 206, layout engine 208,translation memory (TM) matcher 210, download manager 212, translationmemory (TM) data service 214, machine translation (MT) system 216,filters 218, certificate system 220 and a plurality of different datastores. The data stores shown in FIG. 2 include application rules datastore 222, local and private stores 224 and 226, respectively, term basedata store 228 and term base translation data store 230, ontology store232, translation memory 234 and common UI elements data store 236. Ingeneral, application rules are used in the resources to specifyapplication-related rich data, while filters are used to ensure thatentities (or input sources 204) contributing to data are only able tomodify the data they contributed, and that all data added are filteredbased on certain rules. Of course, the data stores can be grouped,merged or split differently, in any desired way. The detailed operationof system 200 is described later in the specification with respect toFIGS. 2-6. However, a brief discussion of the operation of system 200and the items shown in FIG. 2 will now be undertaken.

During runtime, resource manager 206 loads the resources associated withapplication 202 into cache memory 207 (similar scenarios can be foundfor content and other type of localizable data). Resource manager 206also receives calls from application 202 for resources. Resource manager206, in response, first loads a string in a language that is associatedwith the locale currently selected by platform 200. Resource manager 206decides which version of the resource to load based on a variety ofcriteria such as availability, confidence level, user settings, etc.Resource manager 206 may decide to invoke TM matcher 210. To do so,resource manager 206 calls TM matcher 210 to obtain a translation (orlocalization) of a specified resource. TM matcher 210 may also havepre-populated resource data to prevent run-time delays in resourceloading; the pre-populated information will be tagged with relevantinformation such as whether it came from MT system 216 or TM matcher210, its confidence source, etc. This is discussed in greater detailbelow. If TM matcher 210 does not return a match for the resource,resource manager 206 cascades through resource fallbacks so thattranslation can be provided in a different, fallback language. This isalso described in greater detail below. Also, in one embodiment, bothresource manager 206 and TM matcher 210 have fallbacks. They can bedifferent from one another and although the results of TM matcher 210can influence resource manager 206, resource manager 206 can decide tofallback without calling TM matcher 210.

It is not uncommon that changes made by localization on strings forceschanges on the display items containing those strings. Common examplesinclude the need for more space (longer strings), changes on the flow ofa dialog (right to left languages vs. left to right languages), etc. Theadjustment process can happen at localization time, at rendering time orboth. The most common case is that rearrangement and resizing of theitems in a dialog is needed, and the process is referred to as autolayout. The amount and correctness of the information provided duringthe authoring process will influence the results produced at runtime.

TM matcher 210 is situated between various sources of translations andresource manager 206, which requests content to be matched (ortranslated into another language or otherwise localized). TM matcher 210searches the available sources (and those sources which are trusted bythe application 202) to find a translation which has the highestconfidence score associated with it.

Again, a more detailed discussion of the operation of TM matcher 210 isset out below with respect to FIG. 4. Briefly, however, TM matcher 210accesses rules associated with application or content 202 in applicationrules data store 222 to ensure that whatever localization is providedback to resource manager 206 does not cause application 202 tomalfunction. TM matcher 210 first searches local data store 224 andprivate data store 226 to see if a localization already exists. Localdata store 224 holds translations or other localizations of resourceswhich have already been localized, in case the request being made byresource manager 206 is one which has been made before.

TM matcher 210 also invokes TM data service 214. TM data service 214accesses translation memory 234 which contains translations or otherlocalizations of a wide variety of different things, such as common userinterface (UI) elements stored in store 236, as well as defined termsstored in term base 228, and ontology store 232 provides contextinformation for application 202 and an associated domain.

If no localizations already exist either locally on store 224 or 226, orremotely on store 234, TM matcher 210 can access an optionally availablemachine translation (MT) system 216 (or one of a plurality of availableMT systems) to perform machine translation on the content to belocalized. The decision by TM matcher 210 to invoke MT system 216 can bebased on user preferences, the availability of a translation, thequality of available translations and MT-provided translations, etc.Machine translation system 216, in one embodiment, is any commerciallyavailable MT system and is illustratively only utilized for translationsif there were no matches with a higher confidence level from any of theother memory sources (such as TM data service 214 and the local andprivate data stores 224 and 226). The fact that MT system 216 can besubstantially any MT system, or any system capable of using the data inthe different stores (e.g. previous translations) to producetranslations, greatly enhances the extensibility of the system, becausenew or different MT systems can easily be utilized by TM matcher 210.

Of course, the MT system extensibility is not the only extensibility inthe system, but is only one example. Some other examples of systemextensibility include content authoring editors, language parsers, thirdparty translation memories, community editors, development authoringenvironments, connection to web services, etc. Extensibility in theseareas and others is supported by the APIs in platform 200.

In any case, each of the translation resources called upon by TM matcher210 will illustratively provide TM matcher 210 with a confidence score(or translation rate, recycle rate, or other similar measure) indicativeof the confidence or re-use rate associated with the localization beingrequested. TM matcher 210 can then select the localization ortranslation from the trusted source which provides the translationassociated with the highest score. The translations are then downloadedby download manager 212 to local store 224, if they are not alreadystored there.

In one illustrative embodiment, a wide variety of input sources 204 canprovide translation inputs to the various memories in system 200. Forexample, vendors or software manufacturers that develop operatingsystems that incorporate localization platform 200 will illustrativelyprovide trusted terms to the various memories. However, in oneembodiment, input sources 204 can include the community at large and thedevelopment community. The community at large allows anyone thatperforms localization services using system 200 to provide a suggestedlocalization of a piece of content to the appropriate memory throughdata gathering component 205. The input sources 204 may also include thedevelopment community which will (as opposed to the community at large)store translations provided only by developers officially recognized assuch. Thus, it can be seen that platform 200 allows the localizationprocess to be opened up for community involvement on a very large scaleas well as adjusted at a granular level (e.g. user decides what to trustand what not) to meet the user's needs and expectations.

Further, data gathering component can dynamically (during set-up,runtime, configuration, etc.) intermittently collect new data from avariety of input sources 204. The new data can of course be new resourcedata as well as pre-localized data or translation memory data, tosupport new applications, new domains, and to perform self-turning of arunning operating system. This embraces adaptability and accuracy of thesystem.

However, a particular application developer, system administrator oruser may desire that only certain localization content be trusted. Thedeveloper may, for instance, not wish to trust localization content fromthe community at large or the development community, but only fromvendors and OS manufacturers. This allows a developer or user to set theextent to which the platform 200 opens the localization tasks todifferent sources. This can be set even on a string-by-string basis.

In one such embodiment, system 200 includes certificate system 220 whichattaches certificates to content provided by certain sources. In thatinstance, the developer of application 202 may desire that onlylocalization content with an attached certificate be trusted. Forinstance, developers and other contributors might be able to obtain theright to sign their content which is relative to the tier they are in,in relation to their application. That means that a certificate of thedeveloper of an application puts that developer in the developer tierfor that specific application and all other contributors are one tierdown in the “other ISV”, community or user tier. The certificates can betrusted relative to the tier of the contributor. For instance, a givenmanufacturer might always have the highest tier, but from that tier ondown the user can determine a trusted tier and within a tier trustedsources. The indication as to which localization content is to betrusted by any given application 202 or by any user may be stored in theapplication rules data store 222. The certificates help to establish atrust system for translations.

The user or developer can also choose hierarchical trusted sources. Forinstance, based on the origin of the localization content, a user candetermine whether to trust only the OS manufacturer, and if none isavailable, then to trust independent software vendor translations, andif those are not available, only then to trust the developmentcommunity, and so on. In one illustrative embodiment, this hierarchy isestablished by default, but a user can simply accept or override it withpersonal settings. Such settings can be implemented in the applicationrules associated with each application or with an individual machinerunning the application.

Also, it should be noted that private store 226 is similar to localstore 224, in that it resides on a user's data store. However, localstore 224 is illustratively a system wide store while private store 226is a store which can be used to indicate trusted localization contentcorresponding to an individual user including data entered by the userfor their own private use. Therefore, each individual user may identifydifferent trusted localization content. That content is identified tothat particular user in private store 226. This allows an individualuser to customize the localization process even further than thatassociated with an individual application. For instance, the user canmake changes to his or her own applications, as needed and allowed bythe application. The user can also share local or private stores back tothe community.

In addition, certain translations can be locked so that they are notmodified. This can be critically important for avoiding potentiallymalicious translations. For instance, one of the input sources mightprovide a malicious translation which would translate the term “Clickhere to format your hard drive” as “Click here to continue.”

Once TM matcher 210 obtains a desired localization for the request fromresource manager 206, it applies filters 218 and application rules fromstore 222. Filters 218 illustratively define terms which are not to beplaced in any localization content in any given language. For instance,some users may desire to filter obscene terms or any other objectionablecontent. Therefore, filters 218 are applied prior to using the localizedcontent requested by resource manager 206. It will be noted thatapplying filters (as well as any other type of validation) is one stepin localization and can be applied at many steps in the process, such asediting, downloading, using, etc.

For instance, validation, in general, occurs whenever two componentsexchange data, unless the components completely trust one another, andthe channel used to communicate is also trusted (such as againstsurreptitious activity). Therefore, for instance, if resources aredownloaded from a trusted source, and the resources contain a validsignature, no other validation (other than validating the signature)needs to be done. If the source is trusted but the file is not signedthen the channel used to transport the information is evaluated todetermine whether it is also trusted. For example an unsigned file thathas been downloaded from the internet is more likely to be tampered withthan an unsigned file that a user copied from another folder in the samecomputer. Depending on several factors it may decide to undertake aquick functional validation, or some additional content validation maybe conducted, such as checking for offensive words or to ensure terms inthe original resource are present on the target resource (e.g., so“menu” is not translated as “folder”).

Application setup/configuration component 240 is used during setup andpost setup configuration. During setup, application 202 registers itsresources with local resource store 224. Component 240 illustrativelyexposes a user interface which allows the user to localize theapplication to a target language supported by the platform if it is notalready localized. The user interface can allow the user to explicitlyselect the target language. On-demand localization component 241 passesthese requests to resource manager 206 and also possibly to TM matcher210.

Legacy application 242 represents applications that were developed andare not aware of platform 200. Compatibility layer 243 supports existingresource interfaces used by application 242, and redirects calls toresource manager 206.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram which illustrates the operation of platform 200in greater detail, in accordance with one embodiment of the presentinvention. During run time, a user first selects or launches anapplication 202. This is indicated by block 300 in FIG. 3. Next, in thisembodiment, resource manager 206 loads the needed resources associatedwith the application 202 into cache memory 207 (or into another storagedevice, all of which will be referred to herein as “cache”, in thiscontext). This is indicated by block 302.

In the background, the operating system (and in particular thelocalization platform 200) begins translating the resources in cache 207to the desired language. In doing so, platform 200 implements theapplication rules 222 associated with application 202, and the trustmodel (i.e., the trusted localization sources) associated withapplication 202 or the user (whichever apply). Resource manager 206invokes TM matcher 210 for the resources stored in cache 207 to obtaintheir localized value. Localization of the resources loaded into cache207, in the background, is indicated by block 304, in FIG. 3.

It should also be noted that populating the localized resources for anapplication need not wait until runtime. Instead, it can be done duringset-up or at another time. In addition, some parts of localization canbe run at run-time while others can be done at setup or another time.For instance, some of the more computationally expensive or timeconsuming tasks can be performed in the background, during setup or atanother time, while the quicker tasks may be performed at runtime. Instill another embodiment, the tasks can be assigned (by the user) to beperformed at any specific time and the status of those tasks can bedisplayed as well.

As the resources are localized in the background, not only are thelocalized values stored in cache 207, but they are also placed in localstore 224. Therefore, the next time that application 202 is launched,the localization process will be much quicker, because all of thoseresource values that have been localized will already be located inlocal store 224. Thus, TM matcher 210 need not search TM data service214 or have the values translated using machine translation system 216,because the localizations will be remembered by the system. Instead,they can simply be retrieved from local store 224. Storing thetranslations in local store 224 is indicated by block 306 in FIG. 3.Also, on demand, entire translations can be loaded into local store 224using download manager 212.

Of course, the present system can also check for updates. For instance,a non-ideal translation might initially be chosen because none bettercan be located. Later, however, a better translation might be loadedinto one of the memories by one of the sources 204. The resource canthen be periodically updated to accommodate this.

Similarly, code updates might make previously localized resourcesinvalid. Therefore, in one embodiment, code changes triggerre-localization of some or all of the resources.

As the resource translations are made, layout engine 208 identifycertain translations that will require modifications to the layout ofthe display for the application. In addition, the fonts used in thesource language in the application are mapped to the fonts in the targetlanguage. This can be done by layout engine 208 or other components atruntime or at a previous time. Layout and font mapping is indicated byblock 308 in FIG. 3.

In this way, localization platform 200 in the operating system continuesto localize the resources associated with the application 202 and storedin cache 207. It may happen, however, that the application makes arequest for a resource that has not yet been localized in thebackground. Such a request is indicated by block 310 in FIG. 3. Resourcemanager 206 first determines whether the requested resource has alreadybeen localized and stored in cache 207. This is indicated by block 312in FIG. 3. If so, the localization of the requested resource is simplyreturned from cache memory 207 to the application 202. This is indicatedby block 314.

However, if the resource has not yet been localized in the backgroundand stored in cache 207, then resource manager 206 requests localizationof the resource from TM matcher 210. TM matcher 210 then requestslocalization of the resource from the various sources, which it hasaccess to, and returns the localization of the requested resource.Invoking the TM matcher 210 is indicated by block 316 in FIG. 3. Theoperation of TM matcher 210 is described in more detail with respect toFIG. 4.

By localizing the resources in cache 207 in the background, localizationplatform 200 departs significantly from prior systems. Prior systemsload the cache with the resources. However, this leads to significantdisadvantages in localization. If the localization platform waits forthe application to request a resource in order to localize it, on thefly by invoking MT, this likely results in an undesirable delay in theoperation of application 202 or the results will be limited by the setof algorithms that can be used in such a constrained environment(performance requirements can limit accuracy). Current machinetranslation technology requires approximately one-half a second totranslate a sentence. While on-the-fly translation and otherlocalization is certainly contemplated by the present invention,translating all of the resources on-the-fly, using machine translationsystem 216, likely results in an undue delay in the operation of theapplication. Of course, if a substantial number of the resources hadbeen localized before and are stored in local store 224 or private store226, or if they were stored in translation memory 234, and only arelatively small portion of the resources needed to be translated by MTsystem 216, then localization of cache 207 in the background is not asimportant to avoid compromising the operation of application 202.

In any case, TM matcher 210 continues to localize the values in cache207, either in the background, and/or on-the-fly. TM matcher 210continues until all the resources are localized.

In general, TM matcher 210 can work against one or more data stores. Itcan optionally integrate with other recycle engines (such as TM matchersor MT systems). It can optionally take advantage of terminologies alongwith their translations and relationships (ontologies). It can usemetadata to decide which pieces of data in the stores are supposed toconstitute the search space (such as domain area, author, approvalstatus, or other metadata). It can look at restrictions (applicationrules/filters) on the string itself and take advantage of those toproduce a better match or a match that will be more readily validated.Of course, these features are all optional and more may be added orthese can be changed or deleted from the TM matcher operation, asdesired.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the operation ofTM matcher 210 in more detail, for the sake of example only. Resourcemanager 206 first provides TM matcher 210 with a request forlocalization. This is indicated by block 350 in FIG. 4. TM matcher 210then obtains trust model information for the current context. In oneembodiment, the trust model information is stored with the data itself,but might also be stored in private store 226 or in any other sourcethat identifies any other items of context upon which trustedlocalization sources are to be determined given the present context. Thetrust model information can include an indication of which sources aretrusted, or a list of requirements which must be met for a localizeditem to be valid and considered. This assists in update scenarios aswell. Updates on code may change the set of constraints that resourceshave to meet. Those changes will require re-validation of previouslyassumed valid resources. This is indicated by block 352 in FIG. 4.

TM matcher 210 then illustratively requests localizations of theresource from all trusted localization sources, but may do so in a givenorder. The order and the number of sources checked illustratively variesdepending on the circumstances (such as whether the localization istaking place at run-time, setup time, in batch processing, etc.). Thisis indicated by block 354. In other words, in one embodiment, TM matcher210 does not even request a translation from non-trusted sources. Inthat instance, assume that the user does not wish to trust translationsfrom the community at large or from the development community in inputsources 204. TM matcher 210 will only ask for localization content whichoriginated from trusted sources, and will thereby exclude all of thelocalization content provided by the community at large and developmentcommunity. Of course, the TM matcher 210 will modify the sources fromwhich localization results are requested based upon the trusted sourcesgiven the present context.

In response to the request from TM matcher 210, the various sourceswhich have been requested for localization content return theirassociated confidence scores. For instance, it is very common fortranslation results to have an associated confidence level indicative ofhow likely it is that the translation is correct given the input in thesource language. It is not important for purposes of the presentinvention what particular measure is used to indicate the confidenceassociated with a translation or other localization. In the illustrativeembodiment, the scores from all sources either use the same measure, ormeasures which are correlated to one another, so that TM matcher 210 candetermine the relative magnitude of the scores. Returning the confidencescores associated with the translations (or localization content) isindicated by block 356 in FIG. 4.

TM matcher 210 then obtains the localized content (e.g., thetranslation) from the highest scoring trusted source. This is indicatedby block 358. Also, TM matcher 210 can select localized content based onother or additional criteria as well, such as the time required toobtain the localized content, how close the localized content is to thetarget market, validation criteria or other criteria or any combinationof criteria. In addition, the TM matcher can retrieve localizationcontent from multiple sources and combine them.

Once the translation is received, TM matcher 210 applies the filters 218and other validation to ensure that the localization content (ortranslation) is appropriate given the application and context and anyfilters or validation criteria desired by the user. Applying the filtersand other validation is indicated by block 360 in FIG. 4. TM matcher 210also illustratively applies the application rules such that thelocalization content retrieved for the given resource will not inhibitoperation of the application or cause improper operation or otherwisecrash, the application. It should also be noted that some of thefiltering and validation processing can be pre-computed, rather thanwaiting to perform all necessary steps at this point in the process.

Once this is done, TM matcher 210 returns the result to resource manager206. This is indicated by block 362. It will be appreciated that thisprocess will be performed anytime TM matcher 210 is invoked by resourcemanager 206. Thus, the process will be performed when the resources incache 207 are being localized in the background, and it will beperformed when an application 202 makes a call for a not, as yet,localized resource.

In either case, TM matcher 210 may find that there is no translationavailable in the desired language or the confidence scores returned arebelow a given threshold, but that a translation must be undertaken usingmachine translation system 216. At that point, in one embodiment,resource manager 206 is notified, and may request TM matcher 210 to lookfor a translation in a fallback language. For instance, if the targetlanguage is Catalan, application 202 may request translation of aresource, but one may not be available in Catalan. However, resourcemanager 206 may be configured such that Spanish is a first fallbacklanguage to Catalan. In that case, TM matcher 210 returns to resourcemanager 206 indicating that no translation is available in Catalan andthat machine translation system 216 must be invoked to obtain such atranslation (alternatively, MT system 216 can be called on the firstcall by TM matcher 210). Resource manager 206 may, instead of taking theperformance penalty associated with on-the-fly machine translation,simply request TM matcher 210 to return a translation of the requestedresource in Spanish. If one is available, it is returned by TM matcher210.

Of course, as indicated above, the fallback locales/languages may behierarchally cascaded to any desired degree such that various localesare fallbacks for various other locales, the ultimate fallback of whichmay be the source language. Thus, if the ultimate fall back is reached,instead of providing a translation of the requested resource, resourcemanager 206 simply returns to the application 202 the requested resourcein an ultimate fallback which is ensured by the platform so theapplication will not crash or lose an interaction point with the userbecause of the platform.

The user can also illustratively set how the fallback hierarchy works.For instance, the user can indicate that displaying a group of resourcestogether (e.g., a dialog with several strings) can show parts of thedialog in one language (or localized to one market) and parts in another(e.g., in the fallback). Other users may indicate that the displayedgroup of resources is to all be in one language (or localized to thesame market).

It will also be noted that the user need not launch the application tohave it translated by platform 200. The user can simply select anapplication or other software component for localization, and platform200 can localize it in the background. For instance, in one embodiment,the user right clicks on an application and, from a menu, selects“Localize”. Platform 200 then begins localizing the application in thebackground, storing the localized content in the local store. Contentcan also be localized in the background. In one embodiment the userright clicks on a document that is stored in the file system or on aserver and chooses “Localize”. The localization platform will localizethe document in the background. The same applies to documents that aredownloaded from the internet.

In addition, when an application is installed (or at a later time) theuser can select a plurality of different languages for installation.These languages are then loaded into the local data store 224. Thetranslations can be stored on the product compact disc, or other medium.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating the components of platform 200 inthe development context. A large number of items are similar to thoseshown in FIG. 2 and are similarly numbered.

FIG. 5 shows assistance platform 380 and development component 382.Development component 382 can be any desirable development componentsuch as Visual Studio available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond,Wash., or any other desired development component for authoringsoftware. Assistance platform 380 assists in authoring content byinteracting with one or more components of platform 200, such astranslation platform 381 to allow the developer to develop a productwhich has a high recycle rate, and thus a greatly reduced cost forlocalization into different languages. Both development component 382and assistance platform 380 consume services provided by platform 200.In doing so, development component 382 and assistance platform 380 inconjunction with the other components build in certain practices intothe front end development/authoring process which will likely greatlyenhance the ability of the product to be localized to enter into variousdifferent markets and thus to greatly increase the return on thedevelopment investment.

Build component 384 uses the information provided by the localizationplatform and/or assistance platform 380 or any other content authoringtool that can access the localization platform through the APIs and theapplication rules in data store 222 and builds application 202 as wellas content documents.

It will also be noted that the present discussion of FIG. 5 proceedsgenerally with respect to the developer developing an application or anauthor authoring content. However, the system can be used for a varietyof things regardless of the type of content or software the developer isdeveloping or the author is authoring.

In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, there aretwo ways for a developer or author respectively to use developmentcomponent 382 to develop software or assistance platform 380 to developcontent. The first is to use a feature in her authoring/developmentenvironment that, through a platform application programming interface(API) or other similar mechanism determines whether any similar contentor software has already been developed, and is stored in any of thememories in platform 200. The second way is for the developer to simplydevelop the software or content (original or not). In the latter case,platform 200 simply acts to provide the developer with feedback as tothe recycle rate (e.g., the amount of content/software which can betranslated into different languages in platform 200 given previoustranslations) of the content/software and to suggest practices that willlikely increase the recycle rate and also to suggest practices that willinhibit the application from malfunctioning after localization.

In accordance with the first embodiment, the content author provides aninput through assistance platform 380, and assistance platform 380 callsan API or other similar mechanism to author a resource. This isindicated by block 500 in FIG. 6. Assistance platform 380 then invokesTM matcher 210 to access local store 224 and returns all types ofresources that already have translations. This is indicated by block 502in FIG. 6. For instance, the developer platform may invoke an APIindicating that the content developer wishes to author a resource. Inresponse, the platform 380 returns an indication of all of the differentclasses of resources which are contained in platform 200 and whichalready have translations into a variety of different languages. Assume,for example, that the result from the platform and presented to the userby the developer platform are the classes “menus”, and “error messages”.

Through the exposed functionality in the API, the developer can choosethe “error message” classes and assistance platform 380 requests thisinformation of platform 200 (it may be store in any memory) then returnsall of the different classes of error messages which are contained inplatform 200. The developer then selects one of the classes of errormessages, and platform 380 returns all of the specific error messagesassociated with that class. The user can then simply select one of theerror messages, which has already been authored, and for whichlocalization will already be highly efficient (e.g., because it hasalready been translated into a variety of different languages orotherwise localized). The developer selecting the type, class andspecific resource, if available, is indicated by block 504 in FIG. 6.

It will also be appreciated, of course, that the specific, exact messagewhich the developer wishes to author may not be already available. Inthat case, the user can select a very close message and modify it. Themodified message will likely, in many cases, be able to be localizedquite efficiently, because the majority of it was already in existencein localization platform 200. In any case, choosing a similar, notidentical message will result in a confidence penalty. Modifying achosen resource is indicated by block 506 in FIG. 6.

This type of recycling provides the author with a high degree offlexibility relative to a prior art localizer that occurs afterdevelopment. For instance, the author can change the number ofplaceables on a software string, while a traditional localizer is farmore restricted. Also, the author can entirely replace a source sentence(assuming the key terms are maintained) while a traditional localizermay not be able to. Consider the sentence for an error message: “file{0} does not exist.” The author can change this to “file {0} on drive{1} could not be found.”, whereas a conventional localizer cannot usethe translation of the first sentence as a translation for the secondone because, without access to the code, the conventional localizer isnot able to change the underlying assumptions in the code regarding thenumber of placeables. The recycling may not only be done with respect totext found in messages, but can also be done with respect to common UIelements in data store 236. Reusing prior UI elements also enhances therecycle rate and localization of the product.

During development, the developer may also wish to provideontology-to-ontology store 232. Ontology is a specification of aconceptualization and describes the relationships between terms, whichallows semantic encoding of content and strings. One embodiment of anontology is set out in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,253,170 and 6,098,033. Anotherdescription of ontology is set out in Gruber, A TRANSLATION APPROACH TOPORTABLE ONTOLOGIES, Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220 (1993).

In general, words are translated differently depending on context.Specifically, words or terms can be translated differently depending onapplication context in software localization. The localization platform200 has access to semantic data in the form of ontology data store 282that describes the relationship between terms. Ontologies can begenerated manually by entering semantic information together with theword or term or automatically by applying algorithms that are able todetermine the semantic context by the proximity of a words or term toother words or terms. The data store 282 is illustratively populated bystructures and application context derived from the resource format. Thetype of semantic encoding in ontology store 282 allows platform 200 todisambiguate the semantics for the resources to be translated, whilealso providing powerful search capabilities, because it allows for querydisambiguation as well. Translation platform 381 determines whetherdisambiguation is required at block 508 in FIG. 6. If so, ontology store232 can be accessed to obtain disambiguating semantic information, orassistance platform 380 can request the disambiguating semanticinformation from the author, the same way the development component 382can do the same to the developer. This is indicated by block 510 in FIG.6.

As the developer continues developing the product, each of the authoredresources is subjected to a localization rate estimate by translationplatform 381 in platform 200. In estimating the localization rate of theauthored resources, translation platform 381 identifies the percentagesof those resources which have already been translated (or otherwiselocalized) and which reside somewhere on platform 200. Translationplatform 381 also accounts for the requirement to subject the resourcesto machine translation by system 216, and also takes into account theconfidence scores associated with each of the translations residing onplatform 200. These items are combined to provide a recycle rate whichis a measure of how easy the product being authored will be to localizeinto markets operating under different languages. Providing the running,overall recycle rate is indicated by block 512 in FIG. 6.

It will be noted that the recycle rate can be used in a wide variety ofdifferent ways. For instance, if the developer is only developing acomponent of an entire system, the component may be required to meet acertain recycle rate threshold before it is allowed to be checked in.Similarly, the recycle rate may well be indicative of the value of theproduct given how likely it is that the product will be introduced intoother markets. Of course, this recycle rate can be used in a widevariety of other ways as well.

It should also be noted that the system can calculate the recycle ratefor code which is not developed on the platform. The code can simply beprovided to platform 200 and TM matcher 210 can calculate the recyclerate for the code, as a whole, and return it, as desired. This can beused in deciding whether to roll a product out into new markets or evenwhether to purchase rights in the product.

The discussion now proceeds with respect to the embodiment in which thedeveloper is not choosing already-existing resources. Assuming that thedeveloper does not wish to select from pre-authored resources, thedeveloper can author original resources or content. This is indicated byblock 514 in FIG. 6. In that case, the developer simply authors aportion of the content and assistance platform 380 calls TM matcher 210to determine a recycle rate for the authored content. This is indicatedby block 516 in FIG. 6. TM matcher 210 then accesses its localizationsources and returns a recycle rate for the newly authored resource orcontent. This is indicated by block 518 in FIG. 6.

At this point, platform 200 can also be used to notify the author as topractices which may help the author improve the recycle rate of theproduct under development, or to alert the author to certain practiceswhich may cause the application to malfunction once it is localized.Returning these hints is indicated by block 520 in FIG. 6. In oneembodiment, these hints are provided even if the source of the productis being re-used. The fact that it is being re-used may, of course, meanthat some of the checks have already been performed.

Some examples of practices that might affect recycle rate or applicationfunction include, for instance, writing long strings. Long strings arenot just harder to understand, they are also more difficult totranslate. In addition software presents the risk of a buffer overrunthat would crash the application. Other practices that may affectrecycle rate or application function include the use of specialcharacters or the use of improper, or informal grammar. Using propergrammar constructs leads to a great increase in the ability to translatethe text. TM matcher 210 thus provides a real time feedback as to therecycle rate of the code and practice tips.

Also, platform 200 can take certain actions to reduce a negative affectof these problem areas in the content under analysis. These actions willreduce the likelihood that an application will crash after undergoinglocalization. Platform 200 can alert the user that these remedialactions will be taken.

A number of other items should be noted with respect to the presentinvention. First, it illustratively provides hot key automation.Translation platform 381 illustratively tracks hot keys that aredisplayed on any given UI in order to avoid two functions being assignedto the same hot key on a given UI. Translation platform 381 can beinvoked to select a hot key automatically, or it can be simply invokedto check to ensure that no hot key duplication is undertaken on a givenUI. In order to be able to select or suggest a hotkey to the user theplatform needs information regarding which items are available to theuser simultaneously so it can avoid repetitions. That information isclosely related to the one needed to render the information into theuser's computer.

The present invention can also provide validation and simulation of aruntime environment. Once the developer has authored the component, thedeveloper can invoke an API on development platform 382 and platform 200will simulate a runtime environment under which localization isrequired. The runtime simulation allows the developer to physically seethe display on the display screen, after it has been localized. Thisallows the developer to scan for bugs, gauge the aesthetic appeal of thedisplays and to make changes, as desired.

The present invention thus enhances the ability of a developer to reusealready developed content. This significantly enhances the recycle rateand localization of the product.

Further, the present invention provides a system that intelligentlycombines localized content from the operating system, applications, thecommunity and third parties, and from machine translation. The resourcemanager loads resources of an application by returning requestedresources according to needed language or other cultural or marketcriteria from a variety of sources or data stores (also referred to aslocalization content components).

In addition, the localization platform can be used to provide localizeddata to a wide variety of requesting entities, such as applications,browsers, search engines, resource loaders, authoring tools, etc.

Also, by allowing the community and community at large to suggestlocalization alternatives, the present invention allows communitystandard localization to be defined, and, at times, enables localizationinto some very small markets. For instances, the present inventionallows a user to localize an English language application for Swahili.The user may provide this localization back to platform 200 as asuggested translation of the various resources in the application. OtherSouth African users can choose to trust this localized content anddownload it in Swahili, or to localize it themselves or modify thelocalization and provide their own localization back to platform 200. Inthis way, the application can be localized and revised and madeavailable in a market where it might otherwise not be due to smallmarket size.

In one embodiment, when an input source 204 provides data, datagathering component 205 also records metadata, such as origin, usage,context information (such as resource versioning), confidence level,attributes, machine translation hints, etc. Other data can be collectedand sorted as well. Also, in one embodiment, only the input source 204that provided data can change that data.

The present invention not only provides for downloading translationsfrom a community, but uploading them as well. In addition, sourcestrings can be uploaded/downloaded in a similar manner.

It will also be noted that third party companies and communities can addnew source and translation memories to platform 200. In one illustrativeembodiment, platform 200 provides a web page or web service that enablesthe addition of a new source term and its metadata. The users willillustratively be authenticated so that platform 200 can determine thesource of each newly added item.

In addition, platform 200 will illustratively work according to apublished schema (such as an XML schema) which enables users to uploadseveral strings at once. Again, the source of each string is known sinceevery operation may require authentication. Such source strings canillustratively be added with one or more translations. The platform 200operates similarly with respect to terms in the term databases.

Also, in accordance with one embodiment, communities are able to providetranslations to the source strings in platform 200. When editingtranslations, the metadata present in the source is illustrativelyavailable to the “translator” and the metadata is enforced prior toaccepting the translation. This can be done over a simple web interface.These translations can be used by other people, if the user chooses toshare his or her translations with the community.

The present invention also illustratively allows the community to reviewtranslations that already exist on platform 200. This allows a source oftranslations to determine how many times his or her translations havebeen chosen by other users. This will enable input sources in thecommunity to build a name for themselves based on the quality of work,and this drives input sources to do a better job so as to become morevalued in the community.

In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, whena developer uploads an application for translation, the developer isprovided with an opportunity to enable end users to download their ownlocalized version of the product. If that option is enabled, the usercan log into platform 200 and pick which language, engines andtranslations to use in order to generate a personal version of theproduct.

For example, the user can ask for the “xyz” version of a product whilespecifying only exact matches of translation engines using translationmemories that the community (or a specific user) has approved. Thisprocess can be periodically repeated to obtain a higher percentage ofresource translation. Platform 200 can also provides for notificationsto users via mail or other alert services when new translations areavailable.

In accordance with another embodiment, a third party can add a newsource verification (or translation) engine to platform 200. Asdiscussed above, a developer can submit an application to platform 200to determine whether an application is highly localizable. Third partiescan write new engines to support this. When a third party develops anengine that meets the criteria to perform source verification (e.g.,when it implements a desired interface), then the third party can uploadit to platform 200 and charge back for users to download the engine. Aswith the other parts of the processes described with respect to thepresent invention, signing and authentication are illustratively used toensure that the source of the engine is known and the user has decidedto trust that source.

Translation engines can be added in a similar way, but mayillustratively run on the server implementing platform 200 with stepstaken to ensure that the translation engine does not corrupt any alreadyexisting translation data. In addition, the present invention performsglobalization and linguistic checks to assist authors. The presentinvention also allows the community to help an author. For instance, thecommunity can be asked for a source string on a dialog box in a certaindomain, where the source string can be easily localized. This assiststhe author at the outset in authoring highly localizable content.

It should also be noted that, while certain functions are assigned tocertain components in the embodiment described, that need not be thecase. The functions could be performed by different components and sosome components could be deleted, modified or added, all within thescope of the present invention.

It can thus be seen that the present invention consolidates data forlocalization from past localizations of a wide variety of products and awide variety of input sources. Instead of each application or producthaving its own memory of translations, which are not accessible by otherproducts, the platform 200 makes this information available, as desiredby the developer or user, to subsequent localization of differentproducts. It also changes the localization process such that end-usershave access to a wider degree of options to customize (localize) theircomputer experience. It also enables community participation into theprocess. As a consequence, the localization task itself becomes productindependent, only linked to the product through the application context.Other applications can access the localized strings at any time if thetrust model and application context allow for that.

Although the present invention has been described with reference toparticular embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize thatchanges may be made in form and detail without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention.

1. A localization system, comprising: a plurality of localizationcomponents providing localized data that is localized to one or moredistinct markets; a translation matching component that receives alocalization request corresponding to input data to be localized,accesses the plurality of localization components based on thelocalization request, and selects and outputs localized data from one ormore of the plurality of localization components based on predeterminedcriteria; wherein selecting the localized data comprises utilizing acomputer processor that is a functional component of a computing deviceto evaluate an indication of an efficiency with which a particular itemof localized data can be retrieved, and then not selecting theparticular item as the localized data based on a determination that theindication shows that the efficiency is not sufficient in terms ofquickness; and wherein the localization components comprise at least onemachine translation system that provides a certain kind of localizeddata for selection by the translation matching component, the certainkind being prepared data stores of automatically generated translationsof data from a first spoken language into a different second spokenlanguage, and wherein the translation matching component selectslocalized data from the machine translation system upon a determinationthat no desired alternative localized data is located in the pluralityof data stores.
 2. The localization system of claim 1 wherein thelocalization components provide confidence scores associated withlocalized data, given the input data, and wherein the translationmatching component selects the localized data based on the confidencescores, the selection involving an evaluation of a relative magnitude ofa confidence score associated with a first item of localized data ascompared to a confidence score associated with a second item oflocalized data, wherein the first and second items of localized data arestored in different localization components included in said pluralityof localization components, each of the different localizationcomponents within which the first and second items of localized datastroed being identified in a system setting scheme as being a trustedlocalization component, and wherein at least one localization componentin said plurality is not identified in the system setting scheme asbeing a trusted localization component.
 3. The localization system ofclaim 1 and further comprising: a data service component coupled to thetranslation matching component and configured to access the data storesfrom multiple separate and distinct data storage locations.
 4. Thelocalization system of claim 1 and further comprising: a managingcomponent that receives application localization requests from multipleseparate and distinct applications and generate the localizationrequests to the translation matching component based on the applicationlocalization requests.
 5. The localization system of claim 4 wherein themanaging component comprises: a resource manager; a resource cachecoupled to the resource manager; and a compatibility component coupledto the resource manager.
 6. The localization system of claim 1 whereinthe localization system is an integrated part of an operating system. 7.The localization system of claim 1 wherein the localization systemperforms said steps of selecting and outputting so as to select thelocalized data and output it to an operating system that is separate anddistinct from a different operating system of which the localizationsystem is an integrated part.
 8. The localization system of claim 1 andfurther comprising: a trust model store storing trust model dataindicative of trusted localization components given a current context,wherein selecting the localized data further comprises limiting saidstep of accessing the plurality of localization components to accessing,based on the trust model data, only a sub-set of the plurality oflocalization components identified as being trusted localizationcomponents, and said step of selecting the localized data being limitedto selection by the translation matching component only from the trustedlocalization components.
 9. A computer-implemented method of localizingdata, comprising: receiving a request indicative of information to belocalized, wherein receiving a request comprises receiving anapplication localization request from an application at runtime of theapplication; accessing a plurality of localization components thatprovide localized data, based on the request; selecting localized datafrom one or more of the plurality of localization components based onpredetermined criteria; wherein the localization components provideconfidence scores associated with localized data given the input data,and wherein selecting comprises selecting the localized data based onthe confidence scores, the selection involving an evaluation of arelative magnitude of a confidence score associated with a first item oflocalized data as compared to a confidence score associated with asecond item of localized data; and wherein selecting the localized datafurther comprises utilizing a computer processor that is a functionalcomponent of the computer to evaluate a time variable indicative of howlong it would take to retrieve a particular item of localized data, andthen not selecting the particular item as the localized data because thetime variable exceeds a quickness threshold with which the time variableis compared.
 10. The method of claim 9 wherein accessing thelocalization components comprises: accessing trust model informationindicative of trusted localization components, wherein selecting thelocalized data further comprises limiting said step of accessing theplurality of localization components to accessing, based on the trustmodel information, only a sub-set of the plurality of localizationcomponents identified as being trusted localization components, and saidstep of selecting the localized data being limited to selection by thetranslation matching component only from the trusted localizationcomponents.
 11. The method of claim 9 wherein accessing the localizationcomponents comprises: identifying that each of the localizationcomponents is a trusted localization component as determined based onreference to a hierarchically organized trust indication scheme.
 12. Themethod of claim 9 wherein accessing the localization componentscomprises: identifying that each of the localization components is atrusted localization component included in a listing of trustedlocalization components that is specific to a particular user.
 13. Themethod of claim 9 wherein the localization components comprise aplurality of data stores storing data localized to one or more distinctmarkets and a data service component coupled to the translation matchingcomponent and wherein selecting comprises: accessing the data storesthrough the data service component.
 14. The method of claim 13 whereinthe localization components comprise at least one machine translationsystem and wherein selecting comprises: accessing the at least onemachine translation system.
 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the firstand second items of localized data are made available by differentinstances of the plurality of localization components.
 16. The system ofclaim 1, wherein selecting the localized data further comprises limitingsaid step of accessing the plurality of localization components toaccessing, based on a system setting, only a sub-set of the plurality oflocalization components identified as being trusted localizationcomponents, and said step of selecting the localized data being limitedto selection by the translation matching component only from the trustedlocalization components.
 17. The system of claim 1, wherein the systemof claim 16, wherein the system setting is an indication of a levelwithin a hierarchically organized trust scheme, and wherein the sub-setof the plurality of localization components identified as being trustedlocalization components is a sub-set of the plurality that areconsistent with the level within the hierarchically organized trustscheme.
 18. The system of claim 1, wherein selecting the localized datafurther comprises selecting a locked item of localized data, and whereinthe system is configured to prohibit textual modifications to the lockeditem of localized data.
 19. The system of claim 1, further comprising afilter component that filters out, from the selected localized data, anitem of objectionable content.